Export limit exceeded: 376247 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 376247 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (376247 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-44762 | 1 Sap Se | 1 Sap Data Services Management Console | 2026-08-11 | 3.7 Low |
| SAP Data Services Management Console allows an overly permissive Content Security Policy (CSP) configuration and lacks certain restrictive directives, which could enable an authenticated malicious user to leverage this weakness in combination with another vulnerability to inject and execute malicious scripts within the application's context. Successful exploitation may result in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on the availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44763 | 1 Sap | 1 Manufacturing Integration And Intelligence | 2026-08-11 | 7.6 High |
| SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence allows a privileged attacker to exploit insufficient file path validation in certain functions using specially crafted input. Exploitation also requires a legitimate user to subsequently access the attacker-influenced content and depends on conditions outside the attacker�s control. Successful exploitation could allow files to be written outside the intended directory and affect other components, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11810 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| The UpdateHub firmware-update agent's probe handler (z_impl_updatehub_probe() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) parses the JSON metadata returned by the update server into a fixed two-level nested-array struct. After parsing it validates only the outer array length (objects_len != 2) and then dereferences objects[1].objects[0].objects.sha256sum via strlen() without checking that the inner object array of element [1] is non-empty. The metadata is attacker-influenceable network input: the agent fetches it over CoAP from the configured UpdateHub server during its routine OTA probe. A malicious or compromised update server (or, when DTLS is disabled, a network man-in-the-middle) can return a response whose second outer object array is empty. Because the parse target is zero-initialised, the corresponding objects[1].objects[0].objects.sha256sum pointer is NULL, and the subsequent strlen() dereferences address zero. The same defect exists in both the 'any boards' and 'some boards' metadata layouts. The resulting CPU fault is fatal under Zephyr's default error handling, halting or resetting the device, so the flaw is a remotely triggerable denial of service. Impact is limited to availability; it is a read from NULL with no out-of-bounds write, memory corruption, or information disclosure. The fix rejects metadata whose inner object array is empty before any dereference, on both layouts. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37265 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37264 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37263 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37262 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37261 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44764 | 1 Sap | 1 Manufacturing Integration And Intelligence | 2026-08-11 | 7.3 High |
| Due to a Missing Authorization Check vulnerability in SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, an unauthenticated attacker could send crafted requests to the Cost Servlet using specific parameter values. If processed by the application, these requests enable access to backend operations. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read, create, modify, or delete application-managed business data, resulting in a limited impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37260 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37259 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37258 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37257 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54374 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54373 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54372 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54371 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54370 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54369 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54368 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||