Export limit exceeded: 372353 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (372353 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-56085 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-31 | 3.3 Low |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an use of uninitialized resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46466 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-31 | 2.7 Low |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an use of less trusted source vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46464 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-31 | 4.9 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper link resolution before file access ('Link following') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53478 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-31 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18211 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-07-31 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the secure-client-uris client policy executor within Keycloak core services. This component is responsible for enforcing security requirements on client configurations, such as requiring encrypted connections for redirect URIs. Due to an improper check that only looks at the start of a web address rather than properly verifying the host, an attacker can bypass these security restrictions by using a specially crafted domain name. This could allow an attacker to intercept sensitive authentication codes over unencrypted connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10079 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Security | 2026-07-31 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (RHACS). When processing Kubernetes Deployments, ACS replaces deployment identity metadata based on the openshift.io/encoded-deployment-config label. A user with permission to create Deployments can set this label to "null", causing ACS to treat the workload as having empty UID, name and labels and namespace "default". This bypasses deploy-time policy detection and enforcement visibility, prevents correct persistence in Central and breaks violation reporting and compliance correlation for the affected deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18437 | 2026-07-31 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The MailerPress – Newsletter, email marketing & AI automation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the `mailerpress/v1/contact` endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update contact details. | ||||
| CVE-2026-38976 | 2026-07-31 | 7.5 High | ||
| mrubyc through 3.4.1 was found to contain a NULL pointer dereference in src/vm.c in op_super() / OP_SUPER due to a missing runtime guard for top-level super. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67529 | 1 Opf | 1 Openproject | 2026-07-31 | 4.3 Medium |
| OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.6.0, GET /api/v3/time_entries and GET /api/v3/cost_entries rendered _links.workPackage.title and _links.workPackage.href through associated_resource in modules/costs/lib/api/v3/time_entries/time_entry_representer.rb and modules/costs/lib/api/v3/cost_entries/cost_entry_representer.rb without checking WorkPackage.visible or view_work_packages, allowing users with view_time_entries or view_cost_entries to read private work package subjects and ids. This issue is fixed in 17.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68500 | 2026-07-31 | 7.5 High | ||
| Sylius Mollie Plugin provides Mollie payment integration for Sylius applications. Prior to 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1, Sylius Mollie Plugin's POST /{_locale}/update-payment payment webhook accepts attacker-controlled id and orderId parameters but does not verify that the Mollie payment belongs to the referenced Sylius order, allowing an unauthenticated attacker with any valid paid Mollie payment ID to mark a victim order as paid without transferring funds for that order. This issue is fixed in 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51304 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51303 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51302 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 10.0 Critical |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51300 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 8.1 High |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51298 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 7.5 High |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51297 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51296 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | 8.2 High |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51295 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51294 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51293 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-07-31 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||