Export limit exceeded: 10818 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (10818 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2023-22675 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Taylor Hawkes WP Fast Cache allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Fast Cache: from n/a through 1.5.
CVE-2024-11813 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
The Pulsating Chat Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amin_chat_button_settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-48099 2 Codeamp, Wordpress 2 Search & Filter, Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.7 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Amp Search & Filter search-filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search & Filter: from n/a through <= 1.2.17.
CVE-2025-62346 1 Hcltech 1 Glovius Cloud 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint.
CVE-2025-69634 1 Dolibarr 1 Dolibarr 2026-04-15 9 Critical
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE: this is disputed by a third party who indicates that exploitation can only occur if an unprivileged user knows the token of an admin user.
CVE-2024-2970 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The News Wall plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the nwap_newslist_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and modify news lists via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-55758 2 Jdownloads, Joomla 3 Jdownloads, Joomla, Joomla! 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
Multiple CSRF attack vectors in JDownloads component 1.0.0-4.0.47 for Joomla were discovered.
CVE-2025-42616 1 Circl 1 Vulnerability-lookup 2026-04-15 N/A
Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data, configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks: an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their authenticated session. Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent or awareness.  The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0.
CVE-2025-25042 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
A vulnerability in the AOS-CX REST interface could allow an authenticated remote attacker with low privileges to view sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to read encrypted credentials of other users on the switch, potentially leading to further unauthorized access or data breaches.
CVE-2025-53483 2026-04-15 8.8 High
ArchivePage.php, UnarchivePage.php, and VoterEligibilityPage#executeClear() do not validate request methods or CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to trigger sensitive actions if an admin visits a malicious site. This issue affects Mediawiki - SecurePoll extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.
CVE-2025-31328 2026-04-15 4.6 Medium
SAP Learning Solution is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing an attacker to trick authenticated user into sending unintended requests to the server. GET-based OData function is named in a way that it violates the expected behaviour. This issue could impact both the confidentiality and integrity of the application without affecting the availability.
CVE-2025-25056 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.
CVE-2025-27080 2026-04-15 6 Medium
Vulnerabilities in the command line interface of AOS-CX could allow an authenticated remote attacker to expose sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to services outside of the impacted switch, potentially leading to lateral movement involving those services.
CVE-2018-25151 1 Ecessa 1 Wanworx Wvr-30 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Ecessa WANWorx WVR-30 versions before 10.7.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to create a new superuser account by tricking an authenticated administrator into loading the page.
CVE-2019-25247 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Beward N100 H.264 VGA IP Camera M2.1.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add an admin user by tricking a logged-in user into submitting the form.
CVE-2024-12170 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
The ViewMedica 9 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.15. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'Viewmedica-Admin' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2018-25150 1 Ecessa 2 Shieldlink Sl175ehq, Shieldlink Sl175ehq Firmware 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Ecessa ShieldLink SL175EHQ 10.7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add a superuser account by tricking a logged-in administrator into loading the page.
CVE-2025-6001 1 Virtuemart 1 Virtuemart 2026-04-15 8.3 High
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the product image upload function of VirtueMart that bypasses the CSRF protection token. An attacker is able to craft a special CSRF request which will allow unrestricted file upload into the VirtueMart media manager.
CVE-2025-15550 1 Birkir 1 Prime 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters.
CVE-2024-7402 1 Netskope 1 Netskope 2026-04-15 N/A
Netskope has identified a potential gap in its agent (Netskope Client) in which a malicious insider can potentially tamper the Netskope Client configuration by performing MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) activity on the Netskope Client communication channel. A successful exploitation would require administrative privileges on the machine, and could result in temporarily altering the configuration of Netskope Client or permanently disabling or removing the agent from the machine.