Export limit exceeded: 373525 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (373525 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16442 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-08-05 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in the SAML broker component of Keycloak, which is used to manage identity federation and user authentication. The issue occurs because the IdP-initiated Single Sign-On endpoint fails to check if a provider is restricted to account linking only. This allows an attacker with control over a linked upstream identity to bypass login restrictions and gain full access to a local user account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70597 | 1 Electron | 1 Electron | 2026-08-05 | 6.3 Medium |
| Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3, the check Electron uses on macOS to confirm it was launched by a same-signed parent process could be bypassed by a local process. Apps that enable fuse-based hardening restricting ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE and NODE_OPTIONS to same-signed parents rely on this check, and a local attacker could bypass it and run code inside the signed app, inheriting its TCC permissions and keychain access. This issue is fixed in 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53992 | 1 Projectsend | 1 Projectsend | 2026-08-05 | 6.1 Medium |
| ProjectSend r2029 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in thumbnails-regenerate.php that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript by supplying unsanitized values in the start_date and end_date GET parameters, which are echoed unescaped into HTML attribute values. Attackers can craft a malicious URL that, when followed by an authenticated victim with edit_settings permissions, executes injected scripts in the application origin to steal session cookies or perform unauthorized actions including user management, file management, and application settings changes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17735 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-05 | 8.7 High |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in BFCache in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-17630 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-08-05 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of configuration parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4629 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A highly privileged user with `manage-clients` permission can exploit this vulnerability by injecting a hardcoded role mapper into any client. This action allows the user to bypass existing scope restrictions and inject the `realm-admin` role into generated tokens, resulting in privilege escalation and full administrative access to the realm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16071 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the LDAP storage provider of Keycloak, which is used to federate user identities from external directories. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator performs a search using a specific LDAP entry Distinguished Name (DN). Due to missing validation, the system allows lookups for users located outside the configured search boundary, leading to the disclosure of account information from unauthorized parts of the directory and unintended importing of those users into local storage. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14209 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak's Admin UI extension that allows certain administrative users to bypass security restrictions. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) are enabled, an administrator who should only be able to search for users (but not view their full details) can use a specific "brute-force-user" endpoint to access a user's full profile. This includes sensitive information and security metadata. The issue occurs because the system fails to check if the administrator has the required "view" permission for that specific user when using this particular search path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14615 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 implementation within Keycloak's administrative services. When FGAP v2 is enabled, the system fails to properly filter child groups based on the caller's specific permissions when requested through a parent group. This allows a delegated administrator to view details of child groups they are not authorized to access directly, including group names, paths, and custom attributes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14614 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the ClientResource component of Keycloak's admin services when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled. This issue allows a delegated administrator, who should only have limited control over specific clients, to attach or remove hidden client scopes that they are not authorized to see or manage. As a result, an attacker could inject unauthorized data or permissions into the security tokens issued to end-users, potentially tricking other applications into granting higher levels of access than intended. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11986 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-08-05 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the admin-ui-ext component of Keycloak, which provides extended administrative user interface capabilities. The issue occurs because certain bulk role-removal endpoints fail to perform granular permission checks when deleting role mappings. This allows a delegated administrator with limited permissions to remove highly privileged roles from other users or groups, potentially disrupting administrative access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9798 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-08-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a user account is temporarily locked due to repeated failed login attempts, an attacker with valid client credentials can exploit the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) flow to bypass this brute-force protection. This allows continued authentication attempts and token issuance even when the account should be locked, potentially enabling further unauthorized access attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9793 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Keycloak | 2026-08-05 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. When a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) encrypted request object is submitted, Keycloak may incorrectly process unsigned claims if the decrypted content is raw JSON, bypassing the configured signature policy. This allows a remote attacker to submit unauthorized claims, leading to a compromise of data integrity within the OpenID Connect (OIDC) authorization flow. While a redirect URI allowlist acts as a compensating control, this vulnerability violates OIDC Core and Financial-grade API (FAPI) signing requirements. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9689 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-08-05 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a client application is configured to accept broad redirect Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), a remote attacker can manipulate the authentication process by crafting a special web address. If a user clicks this link, the client application might incorrectly prioritize attacker-controlled information over legitimate data. This vulnerability, known as HTTP parameter pollution, could allow an attacker to bypass security measures or gain unauthorized access to resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51144 | 2026-08-05 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Soliton Systems MailZen Management Protal v.2.62, v.2.63 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Role Name, First Name, Last Name, and Username fields. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16573 | 2 Bit Form, Wordpress | 2 Bit Form, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| The Bit Form WordPress plugin before 3.2.0 does not sanitize an uploaded signature image before storing it, allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload a crafted SVG file containing JavaScript that executes when the file is viewed, leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71260 | 1 Esphome | 1 Esphome | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| ESPHome through 2026.7.0-dev discloses plaintext passwords via its web_server component. In WebServer::text_json_() (esphome/components/web_server/web_server.cpp), a text entity configured with mode: password (TEXT_MODE_PASSWORD) has its JSON "state" field correctly masked as "********", but the same serialization path unconditionally writes the raw password into the JSON "value" field via set_json_icon_state_value()/set_json_value(). Because web_server listens on port 80 with no authentication by default, any attacker on the local network can retrieve the plaintext password (e.g. WiFi credentials, API tokens) via GET /text/<entity_id> or the /events EventSource stream. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48834 | 1 Apache | 1 Answer | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Unauthenticated attackers can cause a denial of service via a specially crafted Accept-Language header that triggers excessive CPU consumption during parsing. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48912 | 1 Apache | 1 Answer | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. A missing ownership check in the avatar-cleanup logic allows any authenticated user to delete other users' uploaded files by supplying their file URLs. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50749 | 1 Apache | 1 Answer | 2026-08-05 | N/A |
| Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue. | ||||