Export limit exceeded: 372954 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4038 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-53641 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. From 1.45.1 to 1.62.3, the Postiz frontend application allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into the middleware pipeline. This flaw enables a server-side request forgery (SSRF) condition, which can be exploited to initiate unauthorized outbound requests from the server hosting the Postiz application. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.62.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54122 | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical | ||
| Manager-io/Manager is accounting software. A critical unauthenticated full read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the proxy handler component of both manager Desktop and Server edition versions up to and including 25.7.18.2519. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass network isolation and access restrictions, potentially enabling access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and exfiltration of sensitive data from isolated network segments. This vulnerability is fixed in version 25.7.21.2525. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54819 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| I, Librarian before and including 5.11.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper input validation in classes/security/validation.php | ||||
| CVE-2024-4789 | 2 Stylemixthemes, Wordpress | 2 Cost Calculator Builder Pro, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| Cost Calculator Builder Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to 3.1.72, via the send_demo_webhook() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47578 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Adobe Document Service allows an attacker with administrator privileges to send a crafted request from a vulnerable web application. It is usually used to target internal systems behind firewalls that are normally inaccessible to an attacker from the external network, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. On successful exploitation, the attacker can read or modify any file and/or make the entire system unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45317 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15414 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| A flaw has been found in go-sonic sonic up to 1.1.4. The affected element is the function FetchTheme of the file service/theme/git_fetcher.go of the component Theme Fetching API. Executing a manipulation of the argument uri can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40148 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in PingFederate allows unauthenticated http requests to attack network resources and consume server-side resources via forged HTTP POST requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11970 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| The Emplibot – AI Content Writer with Keyword Research, Infographics, and Linking | SEO Optimized | Fully Automated plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9 via the emplibot_call_webhook_with_error() and emplibot_process_zip_data() functions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22044 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SENTRON 3KC ATC6 Expansion Module Ethernet (3KC9000-8TL75) (All versions). Affected devices expose an unused, unstable http service at port 80/tcp on the Modbus-TCP Ethernet. This could allow an attacker on the same Modbus network to create a denial of service condition that forces the device to reboot. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41668 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. When running a publicly exposed proxy endpoint without authentication, cBioPortal could allow someone to perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. Logged in users could do the same on private instances. A fix has been released in version 6.0.12. As a workaround, one might be able to disable `/proxy` endpoint entirely via, for example, nginx. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41664 | 1 Thinkst | 1 Canarytokens | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. If a webhook is supplied when a Canarytoken is first created, the site will make a test request to the supplied URL to ensure it accepts alert notification HTTP requests. No safety checks were performed on the URL, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. The SSRF is Blind because the content of the response is not displayed to the creating user; they are simply told whether an error occurred in making the test request. Using the Blind SSRF, it was possible to map out open ports for IPs inside the Canarytokens.org infrastructure. This issue is now patched on Canarytokens.org. Users of self-hosted Canarytokens installations can update by pulling the latest Docker image, or any Docker image after `sha-097d91a`. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1751 | 1 Thiagosf | 1 Skitter Slideshow | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| The Skitter Slideshow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2 via the /image.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40718 | 1 Veeam | 2 Backup For Nutanix Ahv, Backup For Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager And Red Hat Virtualization | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A server side request forgery vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to perform local privilege escalation through exploiting an SSRF vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40632 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Linkerd is an open source, ultralight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. In affected versions when the application being run by linkerd is susceptible to SSRF, an attacker could potentially trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by making requests to localhost:4191/shutdown. Linkerd could introduce an optional environment variable to control a token that must be passed as a header. Linkerd should reject shutdown requests that do not include this header. This issue has been addressed in release version edge-24.6.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2663 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The ZD YouTube FLV Player plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6 via the $_GET['image'] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40441 | 1 Doccano | 2 Auto Labeling Pipeline, Doccano | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium |
| An issue in Doccano Open source annotation tools for machine learning practitioners v.1.8.4 and Doccano Auto Labeling Pipeline module to annotate a document automatically v.0.1.23 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the model_attribs parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37359 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. (CWE-918) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not validate the Host header of incoming HTTP/HTTPS requests. By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37208 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Robert Macchi WP Scraper.This issue affects WP Scraper: from n/a through 5.7. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34581 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF. | ||||