| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Contracts Integration, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Security Service product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Oracle SSL API). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Security Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Security Service accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Security Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ApusListing <= 1.2.63 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GiveWP <= 4.16.3 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avada Core <= 5.15.6 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in افزونه حمل و نقل ووکامرس (پست پیشتاز و سفارشی، پیک موتوری) <= 4.4.5 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Kwayy HTML Sitemap <= 4.0 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Popup for CF7 with Sweet Alert <= 1.6.5 versions. |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Work in Process product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.5-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Work in Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Work in Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Work in Process accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Work in Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simple Link Directory Pro <= 15.0.8 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailPoet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This issue affects MailPoet: from 5.30.0 through 5.33.0. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Ninja Forms File Uploads Extension <= 3.3.26 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Activity Log <= 5.6.4 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Zarinpal Gateway <= 5.1.0 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Accessibility Helper (WAH) <= 0.6.6 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor <= 1.6.2 versions. |
| Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag.
This enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write.
All TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected.
We recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6 |
| Inappropriate implementation in SVG in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as 'datstart + dname_valid(datstart, ...)' and passes it straight to 'query_dname_tolower()' without checking that a second name is actually present in the RDATA. The wire-format parser accepts multi-dname RRs whose RDATA ends after the first name, so an attacker who runs a DNSSEC-signed authoritative server can deliver a record with an absent second domain name (e.g. SOA record) and cause 'query_dname_tolower()' to walk label-by-label through stale bytes in the per-worker 'env->scratch_buffer', past the end of that heap allocation if 'msg-buffer-size' has been lowered from the default. This leads to heap buffer overflow and on a release build the outcome relies heavily on the contents of the buffer tail and the adjacent heap chunk. |
| Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
