| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Unified Serviceability component in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform Unified Serviceability actions, aka Bug ID CSCuh10298. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on Cisco Scientific Atlanta DPR2320R2 routers with software 2.0.2r1262-090417 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change a password via the Password parameter to goform/RgSecurity; (2) reboot the device via the Restart parameter to goform/restart; (3) modify Wi-Fi settings, as demonstrated by the WpaPreSharedKey parameter to goform/wlanSecurity; or (4) modify parental controls via the ParentalPassword parameter to goform/RgParentalBasic. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Unity Express with software before 8.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCue35910. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCul25567. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in frontview/lib/np_handler.pl in NETGEAR ReadyNAS RAIDiator before 4.1.12 and 4.2.x before 4.2.24 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ProjectForge before 5.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via vectors related to (1) web/admin/, (2) web/core/, (3) web/dialog/, (4) web/fibu/, (5) web/mobile/, (6) web/task/, or (7) web/wicket/. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/messageselect.php in the messaging system in Moodle 2.2.x before 2.2.7, 2.3.x before 2.3.4, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that send course messages. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in testingLibraryAction.do in the Training Center testing library in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete tests, aka Bug ID CSCzu81067. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in api/ApiQueryCheckUser.php in the CheckUser extension for MediaWiki, possibly Checkuser before 2.3, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that "perform sensitive write actions" via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/settings/update in DClassifieds 0.1 final allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify account settings such as the administrator password or email via certain Settings[] parameters. |
| Google Chrome before 29 sends HTTP Cookie headers without first validating that they have the required character-set restrictions, which allows remote attackers to conduct the equivalent of a persistent Logout CSRF attack via a crafted parameter that forces a web application to set a malformed cookie within an HTTP response. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in HP Service Manager 9.30, 9.31, 9.32, and 9.33 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that (1) insert XSS sequences or (2) execute arbitrary code. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface in Cerberus FTP Server before 5.0.5.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a user account or (2) reconfigure the state of the FTP service, as demonstrated by a request to usermanager/users/modify. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Integrated Solutions Console (aka administrative console) in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.0.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable certain security options via an Edit action to console/adminSecurityDetail.do followed by a save action to console/syncworkspace.do. |
| CloudForms 3.0 Management Engine before 5.2.1.6 allows remote attackers to bypass the Ruby on Rails protect_from_forgery mechanism and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a destructive action in a request. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shut down daemons, (2) start daemons, (3) add shares, (4) remove shares, (5) add printers, (6) remove printers, (7) add user accounts, or (8) remove user accounts, as demonstrated by certain start, stop, and restart parameters to the status program. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ownCloud before 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via vectors involving contacts. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in OpenCart 1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of an application administrator for requests that create an administrative account via a POST request with the route parameter set to "user/user/insert." NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in xt:Commerce 3.0.4 SP2.1 and possibly earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of Admins for requests that (1) set a New user to Admin via the cID parameter to a statusconfirm action in admin/customers.php and (2) grant permissions to users via the cID parameter to a save action in admin/accounting.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 7.12 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that end a session via the user/logout URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue, by considering the "security benefit against platform complexity and performance impact" and concluding that a change to the logout behavior is not planned because "for most sites it is not worth the trade-off. |
