Export limit exceeded: 400215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10804 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1631 | 1 Ibm | 1 Jazz For Service Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Jazz for Service Management (IBM Tivoli Components 1.1.3) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 133140. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4961 | 1 Cloud Foundry | 1 Bosh | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation BOSH Release 261.x versions prior to 261.3 and all 260.x versions. In certain cases an authenticated Director user can provide a malicious checksum that could allow them to escalate their privileges on the Director VM, aka "BOSH Director Shell Injection Vulnerabilities." | ||||
| CVE-2017-8928 | 1 Mailcow | 1 Mailcow\ | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| mailcow 0.14, as used in "mailcow: dockerized" and other products, has CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7715 | 1 Realtyna | 1 Realtyna Property Listing | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Realtyna RPL (com_rpl) component before 8.9.5 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add a user via an add_user action to administrator/index.php. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5258 | 2 Fedoraproject, Vmware | 2 Fedora, Spring Social | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in springframework-social before 1.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4885 | 1 Basercms | 1 Basercms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Feed version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2014-6106 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Identity Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security Identity Manager 5.1, 6.0, and 7.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that can cause cross-site scripting attacks, web cache poisoning, or other unspecified impacts via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7557 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Dnsdist | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| dnsdist version 1.1.0 is vulnerable to a flaw in authentication mechanism for REST API potentially allowing CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6032 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Modbus, Modbus Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Violation of Secure Design Principles issue was discovered in Schneider Electric Modicon Modbus Protocol. The Modicon Modbus protocol has a session-related weakness making it susceptible to brute-force attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9518 | 1 Atmail | 1 Atmail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| atmail before 7.8.0.2 has CSRF, allowing an attacker to change the SMTP hostname and hijack all emails. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6002 | 1 Intelliants | 1 Subrion Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subrion CMS 4.0.5.10 has CSRF in admin/blog/add/. The attacker can add any blog entry, and can optionally insert XSS into that entry via the body parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8814 | 1 Umbraco | 1 Umbraco | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Umbraco before 7.4.0 allows remote attackers to bypass anti-forgery security measures and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks as demonstrated by editing user account information in the templates.asmx.cs file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9863 | 1 Sma | 79 Sunny Boy 1.5, Sunny Boy 1.5 Firmware, Sunny Boy 2.5 and 76 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in SMA Solar Technology products. If a user simultaneously has Sunny Explorer running and visits a malicious host, cross-site request forgery can be used to change settings in the inverters (for example, issuing a POST request to change the user password). All Sunny Explorer settings available to the authenticated user are also available to the attacker. (In some cases, this also includes changing settings that the user has no access to.) This may result in complete compromise of the device. NOTE: the vendor reports that exploitation is unlikely because Sunny Explorer is used only rarely. Also, only Sunny Boy TLST-21 and TL-21 and Sunny Tripower TL-10 and TL-30 could potentially be affected | ||||
| CVE-2017-9490 | 3 Arris, Cisco, Commscope | 4 Tg1682g Firmware, Dpc3939b, Dpc3939b Firmware and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Comcast firmware on Arris TG1682G (eMTA&DOCSIS version 10.0.132.SIP.PC20.CT, software version TG1682_2.2p7s2_PROD_sey) devices allows configuration changes via CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7926 | 1 Osisoft | 1 Pi Web Api | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in OSIsoft PI Web API versions prior to 2017 (1.9.0). The vulnerability allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks to occur when an otherwise-unauthorized cross-site request is sent from a browser the server has previously authenticated. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12593 | 1 Asus | 2 Dsl-n10s Firmware, Dsl-n10s Router | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ASUS DSL-N10S V2.1.16_APAC devices allow CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16565 | 1 Grandstream | 2 Ht802, Ht802 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /cgi-bin/login on Vonage (Grandstream) HT802 devices allows attackers to authenticate a user via the login screen using the default password of 123 and submit arbitrary requests. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15729 | 1 Phpmyfaq | 1 Phpmyfaq | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) for adding a glossary. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4619 | 1 Denkgroot | 1 Spina | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Spina before commit bfe44f289e336f80b6593032679300c493735e75. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8623 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624. | ||||